597
Stop (lemmy.zip)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] pivot_root@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

In a single one-off program or something that's already fast enough to not take more than a few seconds—yeah, the time is spent better elsewhere.

I did mention for a compiler, specifically, though. They're CPU bottlenecked with a huge number of people or CI build agents waiting for it to run, which makes it a good candidate for squeezing extra performance out in places where it doesn't impact maintainability. 0.02% here, 0.15% there, etc etc, and even a 1% total improvement is still a couple extra seconds of not sitting around and waiting per Jenkins build.

Also keep in mind that adding features or making large changes to a compiler is likely bottlenecked by bureaucracy and committee, so there's not much else to do.

this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2024
597 points (93.2% liked)

Programmer Humor

32558 readers
568 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS