74
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Max_P@lemmy.max-p.me 7 points 2 months ago

Also, lame article? ๐Ÿ˜–

It's pretty short, it could be improved with benchmarks or at least some examples of how that would be implemented efficiently. Maybe a bit of pros and cons, cursor pagination for example doesn't handle "go directly to page 200" very well. I've also seen some interesting hacks to make offset pagination surprisingly fast with a clever subquery.

I wouldn't call it lame though.

[-] Ephera@lemmy.ml 15 points 2 months ago

I mean, for what it's worth, you calling it "pretty short" is what made me go read the article, because quite frankly, my attention span isn't long enough to read through an average-length article for a topic like this.

[-] laughterlaughter@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Now we're judging articles for quantity instead of quality?

this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2024
74 points (96.2% liked)

Programming

17314 readers
554 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS