this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2024
44 points (85.5% liked)

History

2471 readers
30 users here now

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Not a new revelation, but the article pulls from good sources and it's nice to see this myth repudiated in a mainstream outlet.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gwilikers@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 months ago

Dan Carlin has a great episode on the historical context behind the decision and how it was really the culmination of a series of - in my opinion - bad calls with regards to the acceptability of collateral damage in bombing by the US.