620

It sounds way less offensive to those who decry the original terminology's problematic roots but still keeps its meaning intact.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] d00ery@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

The master in master branch is, I'd assume, from the idea of Master copy which refers to the original of something, eg a recording, drawing, etc. https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/master-copy

I'm not hugely tied to the word, and things change ... So meh.

[-] meekah@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago

While I agree with your assumption, I think main is less vague. Master can be interpreted several ways, including an offensive one. So while I agree with other commenter in that it's unnecessary to go back and change things retroactively, but just setting the default branch name for new repos in your version control to main is a fair thing to ask IMO.

[-] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 months ago

including an offensive one.

Is the code going to be offended? If so it's probably already offended by it's likely very bad code quality and lack of maintenance and repair.

[-] meekah@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Not the code, but some of your coworkers might potentially be offended.

Also good job with the ad hominem.

[-] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 4 months ago

obviously the code wont be offended, i was just shitposting.

As for the code quality, it's not adhom, it's literally just true. Go ask any seasoned programmer, any senior dev, or any junior dev, they'll tell you it's all dogshit, except for the one pet project they have that hasn't ballooned into a mess yet.

And if you need proof, go load a website, tell me how clean and responsive it is. Surely it has no issues, and works on a cross platform standard. Oh wait it doesn't, surely that's do to a feature difference right? What's that? Spoofing the user agent fixes it? Hmm.

[-] meekah@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Oh, as a programmer myself I'm perfectly aware of how shitty most codebases are. It's just that the context you said this in implied that people who care about political correctness are worse programmers. Dont act like this wasn't on purpose and hide behind "shitposting".

[-] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 months ago

oh, no, i just hate all programmers, no discrimination here lmao.

[-] ultramaven@sh.itjust.works -1 points 4 months ago

When I start “whipping up” the pull requests, I’ll make sure to “rape” your suggestions

[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

That’s offensive too. Proper terminology is “con/noncon”

this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2024
620 points (88.7% liked)

Showerthoughts

30023 readers
683 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. A showerthought should offer a unique perspective on an ordinary part of life.

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. Avoid politics
    • 3.1) NEW RULE as of 5 Nov 2024, trying it out
    • 3.2) Political posts often end up being circle jerks (not offering unique perspective) or enflaming (too much work for mods).
    • 3.3) Try c/politicaldiscussion, volunteer as a mod here, or start your own community.
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS