233

Paying for software is stupid… 10 free and open-source SaaS replacements (www.youtube.com)

submitted 3 months ago by pnutzh4x0r@lemmy.ndlug.org to c/opensource@lemmy.ml

63 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Remember, for every paid SaaS, there is a free open-source self-hosted alternative. Let's take a look at 10 FOSS tools designed to replace popular tools like MS Office, Notion, Heroku, Vercel, Zoom, Adobe, and more.

...

⭐ Repos mentioned

LibreOffice

Mattermost

Nocodb

Plane

Appflowy

Jitsi

ERPNext

Coolify

Dokku

Instant

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] howrar@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

An important component of the cost to consider is how long we expect a company to support a piece of software, and how much it would cost to migrate everything when they drop support. FOSS wins in this regard, especially if you can get a support contact with the devs.

[-] thesmokingman@programming.dev 3 points 3 months ago

Neither wins here. I cannot tell you how many libraries I have had to replace because FOSS devs move on. It’s probably greater than the number of products I’ve had to abandon for lack of support but I’m not sure what that is at a percentage level. In the DevOps world everything burns constantly, paid and free.

[-] howrar@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

It wins in the sense that you still have access to the software and code, and you have the option to either hire someone new to maintain it or switch to something else. Closed source proprietary software only leaves you with the latter choice.