359
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] sibachian@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

there is no evidence that jesus existed and the first writing about jesus appears 100 years after he supposedly died. his original story was eventually replaced with a plagiarized version from mithraism; so jesus = mithra. not that there is any evidence that mithra existed either.

[-] 1stTime4MeInMCU@mander.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

I believe the academic consensus is he likely (>50% probability) existed, but it is for sure disputed by some. Personally I'm not religious and I accept the possibility he existed or maybe he didn't. Kind of doesn't really matter because we can be fairly confident he wasn't the son of god lol

[-] sibachian@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

the problem being that there isn't any evidence at all. if there was, his existence would be harder to dispute lol.

this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2023
359 points (97.1% liked)

Risa

6943 readers
15 users here now

Star Trek memes and shitposts

Come on'n get your jamaharon on! There are no real rules—just don't break the weather control network.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS