538

Hunger rule (slrpnk.net)

submitted 2 months ago by Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone

28 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] blandfordforever@lemm.ee 5 points 2 months ago

I'm on the nurse's side. Fuck the credit card company.

[-] BowtiesAreCool@lemmy.world 26 points 2 months ago

But it said debit card which connects to a checking account of cash that the family would be entitled to.

[-] blandfordforever@lemm.ee 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Oh, you're right. In that case, the nurse is stealing from the patient and not an evil, faceless corporation. This changes everything.

[-] howrar@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 months ago

Even if it were a credit card, wouldn't the estate still have to cover all debts before inheritance? So it would effectively be the same thing.

[-] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

It's not the company money. It's the deceased money that most likely it's part of their family inheritance.

this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2024

538 points (97.9% liked)

196

16508 readers

2532 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS