714
Negativity rule (lemmy.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Failx@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

In theory valid point and I approve but I'd disagree the sustainability factor. Even with renewables we won't have infinite energy, so we still need to think what we need to use the availabile energy for. The taining ist already ridiculously expensive and should the model become extremely popular it might still pull a lot of energy.

Needs to be evaluated on a per model usefulness / Energy Consumption basis.

And I doubt most current models would score very highly on that. (but please tell me those who do)

[-] ReCursing 1 points 2 months ago

The amount of solar energy that hits the Earth every day is enough to power it for a year, and that's not including wind, wave, or anything else. (yes I know we can't gather it all but the amount of energy available is absolutely gigantic

this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2024
714 points (94.3% liked)

196

16591 readers
2256 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS