966
submitted 1 year ago by Navarian@lemm.ee to c/politics@lemmy.world

Sanctions were applied after the social media platform delayed compliance with a federal search warrant that required Twitter to hand over Donald Trump's Twitter data without telling the former president about the warrant for 180 days.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 59 points 1 year ago

Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.

[-] hglman@lemm.ee 73 points 1 year ago

350k is a slap. Criminal charges should be made agaist leaders who ordered the delays.

[-] zcd@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago

Sure would be nice if some rich criminals went to jail instead of a life without repercussions of any kind

[-] Ryumast3r@lemm.ee 33 points 1 year ago

It was doubling every day. They were scared of day 15 where it would've been 780mil for the day and over 1.562billion total.

Every day doubling is a really good consequence, the fact that it only took twitter 3 days to comply once the penalty started actually hitting should confirm that

[-] hglman@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

It took 6 months, and they got fined because they broke the law. If the company knewkon day one it would face criminal charges for non compliance after a period for appeal we would have seen results months ago.

[-] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Can we send Twitter to prison?

[-] ewe@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

Corporations are people my friend

[-] sadreality@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago

Only for free speech purposes but not for criminal or tax.

[-] downpunxx@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

that is what they say

[-] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I'll believe that when a corporation gets executed.

[-] FarceMultiplier@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

I'm all for corporate death penalty.

[-] DarkGamer@kbin.social 24 points 1 year ago

Seems fair. If corporations are legally people, they ought to be able to be incarcerated like people or executed like people.

[-] Lemmylefty@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

I fully agree with this, I’m just not sure what form this would take.

For execution, a dissolution of all properties, patents, inventory, and all assets seized and sold, followed by barring at least the C-suite from working in the same field ever again?

[-] DarkGamer@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

In my mind, incarceration would be a freeze on all their assets and business operations for a fixed period of time. Execution would mean full liquidation as though they were bankrupt, all their IPs become public domain, like you mention. Perhaps with such equality, owners of corporations would no longer wish them to be considered people.

I imagine a C-suite that caused either of these outcomes wouldn't be popular with the investment class since it would cost them meaningful amounts of money. A ban might not even be nessicary.

[-] hglman@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Thats a good start.

[-] hansl@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 year ago

“Who is this Twitter you speak of? My name is X. I don’t know any Twitter.“ - Musk with a fake moustache and glasses.

[-] demlet@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Ha, corporations are legally people but can't be punished as people. I can't see any way that could be abused.

[-] Teon@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Probably not, but maybe we could shut them off from the internet.

[-] mushroom@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

Bro, Elon gutted Twitter. I wouldn't be surprised if they didn't have the right people to get this information. I wonder if it sat in a mailbox for a day before they even had someone look at it.

Twitter isn't a well run company anymore. This could be pure incompetence.

[-] hglman@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Too bad for them.

load more comments (18 replies)
this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2023
966 points (98.3% liked)

politics

19097 readers
4442 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS