522
submitted 1 year ago by RandAlThor@lemmy.ca to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] AssortedBiscuits@hexbear.net 52 points 1 year ago
[-] anoncpc@hexbear.net 31 points 1 year ago

They're more like pro japan party to me.

[-] randint@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

Do you even know why the pro-independence party (DPP) lost so badly in the local election for mayors? Because the people were disappointed in what DPP had done with the economy, not because they didn't agree with the foreign policies DPP was pushing! (Please note that I'm not saying most people agree.) In local elections, people are going to choose whoever they believe would be the best for the city/county, not the one whose views on China they agree with.

Additionally, if you look at the latest opinion poll for the presidental election next year, you'd be surprised to find out that the candidate from the pro-independence party is leading.

Source: am Taiwanese

ps. you made a typo in your comment. it was the 2022 local election, not 2020.

[-] meth_dragon@hexbear.net 52 points 1 year ago

Because the people were disappointed in what DPP had done with the economy

inciting conflict with your biggest trading partner does tend to have negative effects on the economy

[-] randint@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

Well yeah I guess, but really it's more about the policies they had been pushing domesticlly

[-] meth_dragon@hexbear.net 36 points 1 year ago

i am sure the success or failure of those domestic policies were not in the least contingent on international political conditions. the economic policies of an island that imports 97% of its energy with a food self sufficiency rate of around 30% and exports accounting for 70% of gdp can in no way be considered to be overexposed or at risk to trade fluctuations and even if that were the case, i am sure that foreign policy would not play an outsize role in determining the magnitude or periodicity of said trade fluctuations.

[-] AssortedBiscuits@hexbear.net 25 points 1 year ago

People forget that the PRC blocked various imports to the ROC after Pelosi pulled her stunt. The KMT is the "economics party" mostly because it knows not to rock the boat and maintain the status quo.

[-] 5ublimation@hexbear.net 45 points 1 year ago

foreign policy is an area famously known for not having economic impacts clueless

[-] oatscoop@midwest.social 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Because a poll asking a direct question is a hell of a lot more accurate in gauging how the population feels about the issue.

Political parties can lose elections for their stances/actions outside their main one -- which seems to have been the case per the actual person from Taiwan that responded to your comment. It doesn't matter what a party is called or what their main goals are if they're bad at their job.

If and when the people of Taiwan decide they want reunification, it will happen. Thankfully Beijing isn't going to be allowed to force the issue.

[-] AssortedBiscuits@hexbear.net 45 points 1 year ago

You want polls, how about this poll conducted by a Taiwanese university where the majority of Taiwanese want neither reunification nor independence, but the status quo? The majority of Taiwanese people wanting the status quo lines up with how the pro-independence party ate shit while the pro-status quo party made huge gains. The DPP got BTFO so hard the current DPP president Tsai Ing-wen had to resign as party head.

[-] randint@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The majority of Taiwanese people has always wanted to remain status quo, as indicated by the two triangle data lines in the plot. Since declaring independence is basically asking China to attack and that peaceful reunification is not desirable (for >90% of the population) either, the majority are of course pro-status quo. It does not line up with how DPP ate shit last year.

[-] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 13 points 1 year ago

peaceful reunification is not desirable (for >90% of the population)

Again, this was "forced" reunification in that poll, i.e. military takeover. Of course people oppose that. I think at least the plurality opinion is against peaceful reunification under the PRC too, but it's not by as high a margin.

[-] randint@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

No, it was NOT "forced" reunification. The two reunification choices in that poll were "unification as soon as possible" and "maintain status quo, move towards unification," neither of which is forced.

[-] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 11 points 1 year ago

Which poll was this? The last one I saw linked was garbage along these lines though I don't think it was that exact one.

[-] randint@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Thank you for mentioning me. Makes me feel like not all people on this thread is pro-China. :D

this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2023
522 points (93.1% liked)

World News

32326 readers
403 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS