view the rest of the comments
Conservative
A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff
-
Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.
-
We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.
-
Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.
A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.
I think neither of them did a good job.
I would say there was no winner but the Americans lost In that debate
Not a single major poll shows a tossup, but you're entitled to your outlier opinion
What is the goal of a debate? To sway voters. The only voters swayed were by Trump and they were independents. Otherwise nobody was swayed which means nobody won. People are saying Kamala won because of low expectations.
Cite
Cite what? Can you be more precise
Your claim.
Do you commonly ask people to cite common knowledge? Read the news if you can't be more precise since this has all been reported in the news.
So you can't. Got it.
Since you can't be more precise about what you need a cute for, then no, I can't. Just asking for a citation because you don't read the news is silly and unproductive.
This is very much a you problem.