this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2024
726 points (96.9% liked)

Programmer Humor

37734 readers
621 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Why would it be a bad sign that the language has built in tools for common things you need to do?

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 5 points 11 months ago

I'm guessing, they meant to write "that the language has no default way".

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

One of the things that frustrated me more with python, coming from R and Julia, was that the math and statistics functions weren't default. But after learning more, and learning the math, numpy, scipy and others started yo like that, there's different projects working on the same and you pick and choose what works better for you.

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Agreed, numpy really could/should be built in.

[–] xpinchx@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Also pandas and matplotlib but maybe that's just me.

-Data Nerd

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 2 points 11 months ago

But what about the pleasure of starting any project with "import pandas as pd"?

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 1 points 11 months ago

The standard library is where project go to die.