618

Too late. Dominion's coming for you.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 113 points 1 year ago

I’d love to see Dominion or anyone else bankrupt these weasels and the entire organization with lawsuits

[-] HonkTonkWoman@lemm.ee 84 points 1 year ago
[-] Larvitar@kbin.social 24 points 1 year ago

Dominion will probably be happy to settle like last time. Don't count on them making a dent in any of these "news" organizations.

[-] charliespider@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 year ago

Tucker got fired. That has to be worth something.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 year ago

But I don't think we've ever heard why, have we?

[-] evatronic@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago

If you see a guy walk into a building with a can of gasoline, a bunch of matches, and a blow torch, and leave with none of them, and the building is on fire, and the guy stands around and smirks and doesn't call the fire department, and runs from the police, and says, "Some brave awesome totally ripped dude with a huge cock burned that building down!"

While you may not have any evidence, it's pretty reasonable to make an inference.

[-] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

It's been all but confirmed that firing Carlson was part of the settlement with Dominion.

[-] Encode1307@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago
[-] Dee -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Not really, they took a big payout and Fox is doing fine. Very disappointing outcome tbh.

Edit: Downvoters, lying to yourself doesn't change the reality that Tucker and Fox are largely unaffected by this. Tucker can still spew lies all over the internet and Fox barely noticed a drop in profit for the year. I don't understand why we're suddenly okay with large corporations only getting a slap on the wrist.

[-] Encode1307@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

Were you expecting a single lawsuit to destroy the company? Has that ever happened?

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[-] Dee 0 points 1 year ago

Of course not, that's ridiculous and you know it.

This case could've easily been used to challenge the previous finding that they had no obligation to tell the truth as an entertainment company, but Dominion chose money instead. If you're happy with them getting a slap on the wrist as opposed to a real chance of forcing a change in operations at Fox then that's on you. I choose to see the reality in that Dominion chose greed over doing something meaningful in court when they had a rock solid case.

[-] Encode1307@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

You think almost $800 million is a slap on the wrist?

Yeah Dominion should have turned the largest ever defamation settlement on principle. Makes complete sense.

[-] Dee 1 points 1 year ago

You think almost $800 million is a slap on the wrist?

Comparing that to Fox's profits? Yes, yes I do think that's a slap on the wrist compared to the greater implications this could've had on the media landscape.

[-] xthedeerlordx@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

You might want to check again

"A Media Matters analysis of Fox’s new prime-time lineup finds that ratings have fallen roughly 30% since Tucker Carlson’s firing, and over 45% in the key 25-54 year-old demographic"

https://www.mediamatters.org/fox-news/fox-news-prime-time-ratings-continue-crater-lachlan-murdoch-downplays-collapse

[-] jballs@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Tucker's gone, that's a start

[-] Dee -2 points 1 year ago

He's really not though, he's just on another platform doing the same thing. He's not actually suffering any consequences for his actions and the person taking his spot isn't any better.

[-] legion02@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

He's got a fraction of the reach than he used to and Fox still needs to pay out that crazy contract. Big Ls all around imo.

[-] Dee -1 points 1 year ago

It's barely even a dent in their yearly profit margin. Fox doesn't give a shit about this, they can still keep doing what they've been doing without any real consequence.

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2023
618 points (98.3% liked)

politics

19097 readers
4944 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS