310
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2024
310 points (98.4% liked)
Open Source
31724 readers
122 users here now
All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!
Useful Links
- Open Source Initiative
- Free Software Foundation
- Electronic Frontier Foundation
- Software Freedom Conservancy
- It's FOSS
- Android FOSS Apps Megathread
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to the open source ideology
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
- !libre_culture@lemmy.ml
- !libre_software@lemmy.ml
- !libre_hardware@lemmy.ml
- !linux@lemmy.ml
- !technology@lemmy.ml
Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
https://hackea.org/notas/matrix.html
https://github.com/libremonde-org/paper-research-privacy-matrix.org/blob/master/part1/README.md
https://youtube.com/watch?v=W8KEuAEYjQ4
https://disroot.org/en/blog/matrix-closure
https://web.archive.org/web/20210804205638/https://serpentsec.1337.cx/matrix
Which is largely whether or not the eventual consistency model or not is the route to take. Is the resilience for chat worth the explosion of storage & preformance cost of sync/search & maintaining all that data amongst all servers? Or is limited/functional sync without always duplicating the entire history with the occasional out-of-order message & missing old attachments good enough? Is ephemeral chat okay to save resources which in turn makes it more feasible to self-host on lower-end hardware or is it better to trust a couple big servers with massive storage who probably have admins?
Still waiting for an XMPP client to support threads
Got it. I'll use matrix, and you can use XMPP
and judging by user numbers the answer is matrix lmao