102
submitted 2 months ago by Bunny19@lemmy.world to c/linux@lemmy.ml

so a common claim I see made is that arch is up to date than Debian but harder to maintain and easier to break. Is there a good sort of middle ground distro between the reliability of Debian and the up-to-date packages of arch?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] nickiam2@aussie.zone 7 points 2 months ago

another recomendation for Fedora from me

[-] toastal@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 months ago

They don’t package LTS kernels which is pretty concerning—especially if using out-of-kernel modules that don’t always get released in lock step that could leave you with a machine that won’t boot.

[-] nickiam2@aussie.zone 2 points 2 months ago

That's true. i do sometimes have issues with the ZFS package not compiling because of a too new kernel not being supported yet.

[-] toastal@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago

Happy I switched to NixOS to solve this issue for myself

this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2024
102 points (97.2% liked)

Linux

48653 readers
585 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS