185
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2024
185 points (94.7% liked)
PC Gaming
8576 readers
275 users here now
For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki
Rules:
- Be Respectful.
- No Spam or Porn.
- No Advertising.
- No Memes.
- No Tech Support.
- No questions about buying/building computers.
- No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
- No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
- No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
- Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Let's see what the suit will actually be about (which patent) and then judge accordingly
No need to wait, Nintendo’s lawsuit is frivolous regardless of what patent they try to use.
https://www.gamesindustry.biz/nintendos-patents-were-designed-to-take-on-palworld
The article itself admits that it's hinged on two "substantial what if's"
Just be patient and wait until more information comes out.
We know it's a patent suit though. Just because the article focuses on specific patents doesn't mean those parents are not already ridiculous and that the lawsuit, even if it's not based on those specific patents, is also ridiculous.
If you read the article, those "ifs" are only in reference to whether a US suit will be filed. The analysis of Nintendo's BS patents all makes sense.