this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2024
117 points (96.8% liked)

okmatewanker

1396 readers
1 users here now

No foul language - i.e. French 🤮

Obviously satire, dozy wankers

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
flamingos@feddit.uk
117
Britain was not the... wealthiest of Roman conquests (lemmy.world)
submitted 10 months ago by GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk to c/okmatewanker@feddit.uk
8 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Justas@sh.itjust.works 6 points 9 months ago

It also required so many soldiers to keep that anyone put in charge of Britannia could take the legions to march on Rome and would have a chance of becoming the new emperor.