590
PDFs (slrpnk.net)

The whispering is all in her head and says she sucks

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] veni_vedi_veni@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

The problem is they expect everyone to jump through hoops for them as if all the candidates are the same and they just need to pick one.

Had a job posting asking candidates to go on a goosehunt to find pictures of a landmark at some coordinates they provided, under the guise of "this proves you have attention to detail"... sod off.

And I don't know why some posting still require CVs... like they don't realize ChatGPT exists to write the fluff that they aren't going to read.

Seriously, job opportunities have almost always been a numbers game, there's an opportunity cost to investing time in these games that could be better spent applying to more jobs.

[-] lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 weeks ago

Actually, I do read the fluff. Not HR though, just the technical approver whether the candidate's skillset looks up to the task.

Had one candidate whose letter claimed their experience in one field would be valuable for their work with us. Indeed, they did have plenty of experience in it. If that was the field I was working in, I'd have considered them a great fit.

Unfortunately, we're a different field. Not that it would disqualify them - I'm the last person to hold a lazy copy-paste-fill template against anyone. I hate those things too. I just found that slip-up amusing.

(And I also wouldn't hold a will to switch tracks against them either. I didn't even know anything about my field four years ago, but now I love it.)

this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2024
590 points (97.6% liked)

LinkedinLunatics

3419 readers
264 users here now

A place to post ridiculous posts from linkedIn.com

(Full transparency.. a mod for this sub happens to work there.. but that doesn't influence his moderation or laughter at a lot of posts.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS