202
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by ericbomb@lemmy.world to c/frugal@lemmy.world

Stolen from Reddit

https://www.reddit.com/r/dataisbeautiful/comments/1ftmkwt/oc_foods_cost_vs_caloric_density/

But I loved it. Also this has Shrimp removed, because it was on the OG chart due to an error and this is an updated version.

EDIT: Here is one for protein! https://www.reddit.com/r/budgetfood/comments/1fp2ytb/foods_cost_per_gram_of_protein_vs_protein_density/#lightbox

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ericbomb@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

I think it's good to point out how dense they are when shopping. Cause you might be like "walnuts are so expensive per pound, no way they're worth it!" when really they are, they are just crazy dense.

Also if you are caring about "bulk" eating, where you want to make sure your stomach feels full all day, you want more things on the left side cause you'll feel like you are eating more food.

so it is interesting I felt!

[-] 7EP6vuI@feddit.org 3 points 1 month ago

yes, interesting, i just wondered if i'm missing something, maybe my statement was a bit too negative :-/

[-] MutilationWave@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

People who live in poverty could use this graph to plan the cheapest way to get their calories to avoid starving with very little money.

Is that what you're missing?

this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2024
202 points (98.6% liked)

Frugal

5031 readers
1 users here now

Discuss how to save money.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS