The irony of powering AI on atomic energy. (undark.org)

submitted 1 month ago by Dot@feddit.org to c/technology@lemmy.world

31 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 121 points 1 month ago

a dying and dangerous 20th century technology

I stopped reading there, nuclear is statistically the safest form of energy generation.

[-] jungle@lemmy.world 50 points 1 month ago

And it tries to paint it as bad for the environment in this paragraph:

But the mining, milling, and production of nuclear fuel, as well as the construction and decommissioning of nuclear plants, emit greenhouse gases at levels ranging from 10 to 130 grams of carbon dioxide per kilowatt hour of power — lower than fossil fuels but higher than wind and hydroelectricity (and roughly on par with solar).

So... It's good then?

[-] scarabic@lemmy.world 30 points 1 month ago

The author of this article personally breathed out 800 pounds of CO2 last year. Less than a horse but more than a badger and roughly on par with a kangaroo.

load more comments (23 replies)

this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2024

21 points (57.6% liked)

Technology

59390 readers

2626 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS