88
submitted 1 year ago by CAVOK@lemmy.world to c/europe@feddit.de
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] MattMastodon@mastodonapp.uk 0 points 1 year ago

@Claidheamh

Because there are a number of problems with #nuclear

It's so expensive it requires state support to even get the financing off the ground. And a wealthy state at that.

Safety issues mean the risk has to be underwritten by a government as no insurer will touch it

Disposal costs destroy the economic viability so this has to be underwritten by the state

They consume huge amounts of water

So, even China is backing off from nuclear

#ukpolitics #uspol

https://www.colorado.edu/cas/2022/04/12/even-china-cannot-rescue-nuclear-power-its-woes#:~:text=There%20are%20accident%20risks%20and,China%20can%20expand%20nuclear%20energy.

[-] Claidheamh@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago

That is an incredibly biased article. And most of those claims are demonstrably false. The fact remains that the past 60 years of worrying about economics has put us in this situation. And that short sightedness is proving catastrophic for the planet. What is the economic viability of worldwide catastrophe?

this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2023
88 points (97.8% liked)

Europe

8324 readers
1 users here now

News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ

(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures

Rules

(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)

  1. Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
  2. No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
  3. No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.

Also check out !yurop@lemm.ee

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS