The Corruption of Open Source (techwontsave.us)

submitted 1 week ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/opensource@lemmy.ml

6 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] tengkuizdihar@programming.dev 6 points 1 week ago

The description mentioned open source ai definition doesnt require data to be open. But https://opensource.org/ai/open-source-ai-definition explicitly require the data to be open?

[-] Masterkraft0r@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

no it doesn't. it only says the weights and information about the training data must be open, not the training data itself. which is honestly useless.

[-] tengkuizdihar@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago

Data information == metadata?

(2) a listing of all publicly available training data and where to obtain it; and (3) a listing of all training data obtainable from third parties and where to obtain it, including for fee.

imo this also includes "the data must be open". The data used for training must be obtainable.

[-] Masterkraft0r@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 week ago

that's your interpeetation. what's missing for me is "must be freely (as in not only by specific entities) obtainable". with this wording i could just say: "this data is not obtainable" and be done with it.