-25
It's the users, not the architecture
(lemmy.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2024
-25 points (17.9% liked)
Linuxsucks
188 readers
43 users here now
Rules:
- FOSS advocates and Linux evangelists aren't welcome. -We ask that you block us.
- Moderation is heavy handed. Try to stay on topic.
- No Complaining Mute the sub if users, content, or rules bother you
founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
Why would want to use Adobe anyway? Their products are inferior to open source alternatives such as Krita, Inkscape, or Kdenlive
Photoshop is vastly superior to GIMP, and isn't Kdenlive buggy as hell (crashing all the time)?
I didn't mention GIMP
You didn't mention a photo editor.
I mentioned Krita, lol, and even if I hadn't there's no reason to assume GIMP, the most unintuitive piece of software to grace our desktops.
Krita is not a good photo editor. It's missing a ton of photo editing features compared to GIMP or Photoshop. The target demographic is digital painters.
I guess I mostly edit my photos with AI, so Krita is sufficient for my needs, but I take your point.
Gimp is fine
Krita is an art / painting program. -Not designed for photo editing. It's also from KDE so expected to be buggy: https://www.qwant.com/?q=krita+buggy&t=web
Some of us just want to get work done instead of tolerate and trouble shoot *admittedly buggy foss software.
Yep, typical KDE software: https://www.qwant.com/?q=kdenlive+buggy&t=web