746
checkmate (slrpnk.net)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 36 points 4 days ago

It's hilarious that you think that proprietary software is actually better.

[-] MareOfNights@discuss.tchncs.de 24 points 4 days ago
[-] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 9 points 4 days ago

Add to that photo editing (as much as GIMP is great...). I would guess DAW and video editing would fall under that category, too...and good luck finding many AAA open source games.

[-] MareOfNights@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 4 days ago

Photo and Video editing is actually pretty good, since the backends (magick/ffmpeg) are open source

[-] VOwOxel@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 3 days ago

I've recently exchanged Davinci Resolve for Kdenlive on my pc, and have been extremely pleased with it.

[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

If only Autodesk didn't exist, then yeah

[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 21 points 4 days ago

Well, sometimes it happens. Lemmy was semi-broken during the APIocalypse, and there still isn't such a thing as a FOSS Facebook, or search engine backend for that matter.

[-] RandomVideos@programming.dev 8 points 4 days ago

I have heard that friendica is similar to facebook

[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

That's what it's trying to do. There's no way in hell it has the same level of technical features, let alone the same network size, though.

That being said, I've never been on either.

[-] UnRelatedBurner@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 days ago

Can you get (almost) every single person on there? Until not facebook is unreplaceable.

[-] RandomVideos@programming.dev 2 points 3 days ago

I can guarantee that every single person alive will use friendica before then end of the universe

[-] UnRelatedBurner@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago

"Where do they bury the survivors?"

[-] blaue_Fledermaus@mstdn.io 0 points 4 days ago

I haven't really looked into it, but isn't Friendica supposed to be the FOSS Fediverse Facebook?

[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

It's trying to be. You can't do everything on there you can do on Facebook, though, which is pretty much this meme.

[-] Xavienth@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 4 days ago

Adobe products often have no real equal. It sucks, but it's the way it is. Gimp doesn't come close to Photoshop, Inkscape is almost as good as Adobe Illustrator, and After Effects is the most capable video editing software I've ever used.

It sucks that they try and lock you into proprietary file formats, like Substance Painter.

[-] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 2 points 4 days ago

Yeah, the only software that can stand toe to toe with Adobe is Affinity, and they're winning at the no subscription pricing. Other than that Adobe is really no equal when it comes to FOSS, a lot of those alternative is just us tolerating the flaw. Used to do stuff with photoshop, illustrator, flash, and after effect, switching to foss is...rough. Like you said, Gimp is barely usable, inkscape is good but far behind illustrator, and i don't think flash and after effect have any foss alternative when i looking for it. The only free alternative to after effect that is good is davinci resolve, but that's still proprietary.

[-] toastal@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 days ago

I hope all of these anti-GIMP folks have looked into the 3.0-RC* releases…

[-] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I'm already way passed my time of using image editing software, but i've also heard people say the same for 2.0, but in my experience i still have to tolerate a lot of UX shit. And crash. But cool nonetheless, i'll check it out. Professional still should just get Affinity rather than struggle with a release candidate.

[-] toastal@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 days ago

2.0 was released 20 years ago in 2004… a lot of things, including software, can change in 20 years. 3.0 finally has adjustment layers, et al. that they have been working on since I first started following in 2008 but had blockers on GEGL & all sorts of massive refactors… which are now finally coming. If there was a time to try to get a new opinion on GIMP, it will be now (or very soon when 3.0 is finally officially released).

[-] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 1 points 4 days ago

I heard of Gimp 2 and tried it around 2013/14, the version of that time is what my opinion is based on. Granted it's been 10 years or so i first tried it and i need it as i have no access to adobe software anymore. Right now i've no used of image editing software, but i guess it's my only option if i need it.

this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2024
746 points (98.4% liked)

Programmer Humor

32479 readers
342 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS