577
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 124 points 23 hours ago

Kamala raised over $1 billion dollars for her campaign, most of which was from small donors.

If that doesn't tell the Dems they don't need oligarch money, nothing will.

[-] twistypencil@lemmy.world 29 points 19 hours ago

Then they spent it on high per hour political consultants who paid Beyonce to perform

Except Beyonce literally didn't perform for Harris?

[-] lemmyman@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago
[-] twistypencil@lemmy.world 0 points 6 hours ago

Oh. I heard Oprah got a mil, but that could be fake

[-] lemmyman@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

I heard Elon was born on the moon, but that could be fake too. I wish there was a way to know for sure, or at least see a small amount of evidence one way or the other.

[-] Ismay@programming.dev 62 points 22 hours ago

They know that. Problem is the WANT billionaires money too ^^

[-] Eldritch@lemmy.world 18 points 21 hours ago

That's a mere pittance compared to what the wealthy actually spend on conservatives and messaging. That's 1 billion dollars every 4 years. Fox news, daily wire, OANN, and all the myriad of other propaganda outlets churn through more than that a year.

[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 40 points 21 hours ago

Yes, but we're not talking about conservatives.

The Democratic party has a problem, and that problem is what Democratic voters want doesn't align with what Democratic donors want. The voters want progressive policies passed, while the donors want the same neoliberalism that keeps them rich. And trying to appease one of those groups obviously alienates the other.

If any Democratic politician truly wants to help the American population, the fact that Kamala raised so much money in such a short amount of time, and the fact that many states passed progressive policies even though they voted for Trump, should tell them that they don't need to kowtow to the wealthy because the voters will support them. Unfortunately, I don't think they're going to learn that lesson.

Republicans, of course, don't have this problem because their voters and their donors all want the same thing.

[-] Resonosity@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

I donated to Kamala's campaign ($10), but then I realized what direction they were taking around the DNC and stopped giving them money.

Not all doners agreed with her platform, just like how not all voters did.

[-] Eldritch@lemmy.world 6 points 20 hours ago

The whole point of this was asking why Democrats are catering to wealthy conservative donors instead of progressive or left leaning voters. I just stated the reason why. The 1 billion dollars collected from small donors every four years for a presidential run is nice. But it's nothing compared to what the wealthy dump into messaging and campaigning constantly. Until such time as small donors can even come close to remotely matching that. Sustaining entire media Outlet ecosystems to counter the propaganda from conservatives. Democrats aren't going to give up trying to get some of that wealthy conservative money

[-] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 5 points 22 hours ago

What happens to the amount they didn't spend?

[-] metaStatic@kbin.earth 5 points 22 hours ago
[-] kreskin@lemmy.world 12 points 20 hours ago

Maybe if they go bankrupt we can start a new party that cares what its voters think and doesnt shit the bed so often.

[-] metaStatic@kbin.earth -3 points 19 hours ago

nothings stopping you right now

[-] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 5 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

Money, time, and connections are pretty big things you need to start a new political party.

It's not like advertising a garage sale. I like your spirit though.

[-] metaStatic@kbin.earth 0 points 14 hours ago

another party failing won't make any of that easier

[-] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 1 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

X for doubt on that. Im sure they've said that though. That's a lot of really expensive campaign parties for a three month run

[-] Pieisawesome@lemmy.world 2 points 28 minutes ago

Overall, they are stil about ~100mm in the black.

Iirc, they had 140mm in debt and 240mm in cash on hand.

They spent stupidly, they were buying ads in Kentucky and Texas, instead of focusing on swing states and progressive policies to bring dems out in force.

[-] ZK686@lemmy.world -1 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

It was celebrity money, you know, the same people that were telling people they were "just like them."

[-] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 0 points 23 hours ago

Really awesome point! I hope that becomes apparent to them

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 13 points 23 hours ago

Narrator: It didn't.

this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2024
577 points (97.5% liked)

politics

19096 readers
3414 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS