243
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] blind3rdeye@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago

Unless I've misunderstood the law, it doesn't hurt small engines, because small search engines don't have to pay.

[-] atrielienz@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

https://lemmy.world/comment/13446861

It's also worth noting that if Google has to pay, they may very well just not bother to show that information in search results which also hurts small search engines who rely on Google for part of their search Indexing.

[-] blind3rdeye@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

That does sound pretty bad. I guess it really highlights the power of a monopoly. Businesses may rely on each other, but if one relies more, then they pay all costs due to necessity while the other pays nothing because they can easily outlast the pain.

[-] atrielienz@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago

It could be different. But different doesn't necessarily mean better unless we design it to be better. It's so hard as a little guy to get a foothold in search without one of the big 2.

this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2024
243 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

59419 readers
2954 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS