778
submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by lgsp@feddit.it to c/fuckcars@lemmy.world

Edit: to clarify: the message in the ad is actually ironic/satirical, mocking the advice for cyclists to wear high-viz at night.

It uses the same logic but inverts the parts and responsabilities, by suggesting to motorists (not cyclists) to apply bright paint on their cars.

So this ad is not pro or against high-viz, it's against victim blaming

Cross-posted from: https://mastodon.uno/users/rivoluzioneurbanamobilita/statuses/113544508246569296

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SirQuackTheDuck@lemmy.world 34 points 3 weeks ago

Bikes have lights on them too.

[-] Mrfiddles@feddit.nl 12 points 3 weeks ago

Unless you're in the Netherlands, where 2/3rds of the bikes will have the shitty "this is legally a light" LEDs from the convenience shops... Oh, and 2/3rds of those will be either out of battery, or installed facing the wrong way.

[-] SirQuackTheDuck@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Must be a big city problem. I do see them, but the majority uses proper mounted lights.

One upside of those illegal fat bikes is that the lights usually work just fine, making them easy to see.

[-] Mrfiddles@feddit.nl 2 points 3 weeks ago

I'm in a university town, so it's probably more of a problem here 😅

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 10 points 3 weeks ago

From my experience, usually they don't. Even the ones that do aren't to the same degree as a car is required to. I want biking to be better than driving, so this is not an anti-bike comment. Maybe we need to add a requirement for bikes to have lights like we require for cars?

[-] SirQuackTheDuck@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

In this thread: difference in worldwide laws. In the Netherlands you get fined 65+ eur per broken or missing light on your bike. Checks are frequent.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 weeks ago

That's good! I guess that's the difference between viewing it as a utility vehicle and a recreational one. In the US it's almost always seen as recreation only.

[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee 2 points 2 weeks ago

If it’s gonna be around other vehicles, it should have lights for the purpose of traffic negotiation.

[-] bluewing@lemm.ee 3 points 3 weeks ago

With all all the ebikes out there it is trivial to add a headlight, brake lights, turn signals, and marker lights and require them to be used and maintained like any other road worthy vehicle.

[-] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 weeks ago

Ideally. In the US you regularly see peeps riding without even reflectors. It’s insanity.

[-] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

That's legally required? Every bike has a light on it by law?

[-] frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe 0 points 3 weeks ago

Where? I haven't seen a bicyclist using lights in months.

this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2024
778 points (93.6% liked)

Fuck Cars

9787 readers
629 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS