1772
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by moosetwin@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/technology@lemmy.world

Bluesky Post (this was also posted on twitter)

I was hoping to find a statement from the aggressor, but it seems to be too early.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Furbag@lemmy.world 144 points 2 weeks ago

If lawmakers would simply make the entity responsible for the operation of these AI powered tools be fully liable for every decision that it makes, right or wrong, this kind of nonsense would vanish overnight.

I hope the people running itch.io have great lawyers, because I would be trying to take Funko to court for punitive damages over something like this.

Also, while we're at it, reform the DMCA to disallow automated copyright related takedown requests without some sort of human reviewing it at the other end. It's been abused to hell and back by big business.

[-] Ghoelian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 60 points 2 weeks ago

Also, while we're at it, reform the DMCA to disallow automated copyright related takedown requests without some sort of human reviewing it at the other end. It's been abused to hell and back by big business.

Itch.io shared on hackernews that they apparently sent a report for fraud and phishing, not copyright infringement. So sounds like funko was abusing the system even if automated copyright claims weren't a thing.

[-] treadful@lemmy.zip 21 points 2 weeks ago

If lawmakers would simply make the entity responsible for the operation of these AI powered tools be fully liable for every decision that it makes, right or wrong, this kind of nonsense would vanish overnight.

They are? AI isn't some autonomous entity with its own legal rights and responsibilities.

The problem is that these actions aren't illegal. This is all a civil issue, and yeah, hopefully itch.io puts a hurt on Brand Shield but I doubt it.

[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee 11 points 2 weeks ago

If you think about it, until now there’s been an u spoken, automatic limit on all government activity because some person has to actually implement all government activity.

That’s been, through all of history, at least some kind of filter on the actions government would take.

(I’m using the term “government” ultra loosely, since in this case it’s a private entity implementing policy; “government” as in an authority who can halt a person’s operations as they see fit. “Government” in the same way management or command structure or the principal’s office is like a “government” in its little realm of operation).

Up until now, government has to be done by people. But AI makes it easy to do tons of activity, which can have a larger disruptive impact.

this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2024
1772 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

60070 readers
3887 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS