1041
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Summary

Senator Bernie Sanders is intensifying his fight against U.S. oligarchy, targeting wealthy individuals like Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, and Mark Zuckerberg.

Sanders argues that these billionaires manipulate the global economy, influence elections, and control the government, hindering democracy and exacerbating global inequality.

He believes this issue is crucial, impacting various aspects of society, including climate change, healthcare, worker protections, and poverty.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 5 points 3 days ago

oh yeah. losing elections would have changed things greatly. no third party is going to pull enough from the two current parties,

[-] Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee 3 points 3 days ago

The Dems lost anyway... If Bernie had started a party that did okay this time, it would do even better next time... Until it's the Dems who are the "3rd party" and can either fall inline or get fucked

[-] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 0 points 3 days ago

but the dems have won and a third party has never won and its bad enough having republicans in power half the time. having them in power for decades in the slight hope that they will be dethroned after that is the height of madness.

[-] Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee 2 points 3 days ago

A third party has never been given a fair chance. Bernie is the first person in my lifetime who I think could pull it off... But he only has to get more people to sign up for his party than the Dems... 45m Dems, I think at least 15m go with Bernie... That would mean all he has to do is get 15m newbies to sign up... I think it's doable, even if he actually had to get 25m.

[-] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 2 points 3 days ago

all I know is it has not happened historically that I know of outside of the very founding of the nation before things settles down. Yeah the dominant ones morphed and sometimes changed name but it was not like an actual outside party became dominant. further I have had to live with the worse party being in power half the time for the last 50 years due to unsuccessful attempts and things have gotten worse and worse. A one step forward, two steps back scenario. I have said it before but its a choice of with or without lube. I get that some want to vote for no sodomy but having taken it without lube so much I am unwilling to not vote for with lube.

Considering Trump co-oped his rhetoric im pretty sure Bernie could have won without corporate support. He would have at least pushed the democrats to the left by threatening their left wing voter base. Or perhaps he would have convinced more people to vote who normally wouldnt have because the two options suck. Its easy for Bernie to say "wow I wish there was a workers party" but he literally could have made it and he has no excuse.

[-] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 1 points 3 days ago

this same thing keeps being brought up with third party but it never happens. democrats lesson is the extreme left does not vote for them and going left does not help. Meanwhile rebublican administrations bring us more and more right and the dems oftentimes can't even get us back to we were before another round of more right. could, perhaps but not really.

Ten million people didnt even bother to vote compared to 2020 and more roughly 33% of people didnt vote. Theoretically he could have won and not taken a single vote away from either party.

[-] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 1 points 3 days ago

ten million would not have won and again taking any historical reality into consideration getting 100% of the possible eligible electorate is a pipe dream. I just can't get behind something that has been shown not to work through all of history even though it has indeed been tried. I mean it did not even happen in the hippy erra when tune in, turn on, drop out was a slogan.

Historically it didnt work because nobody tried it and once again Bernie would have rather worked with the Democrat establishment then try to win.

[-] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 1 points 2 days ago

It has been tried. continually. third parties are not a new recent thing. I mean the green party is about the environment which is the most significant problem in the world since the industrial revolution and has been recognized as significant since the 60's politically and the party has existed in the us since the 80's and its an international movement.

[-] crusa187@lemmy.ml -3 points 3 days ago
[-] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 6 points 3 days ago

yeah or the reality we face today. the fact that republicans win at all indicates the problem. Yeah democrats are not what we would exactly want but republicans have gotten crazy comic villian level of bad and they still get in. If republicans were losing pretty much every election there would be a chance of a third party gaining traction but as it stands its a non starter.

this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2024
1041 points (99.2% liked)

politics

19223 readers
2827 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS