116
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by aclarke@lemmy.world to c/opensource@lemmy.ml

I was recently furloughed from work, so in between job applications, I decided to polish off Sonarr support in my Managarr TUI. Thus, I'm very proud to announce the beta release of Managarr with Sonarr support!

TL;DR: Managarr is a TUI and CLI for managing your Servarr instances. As of now, it now supports both Radarr and Sonarr and all the features that are available in the UI are also available in the CLI for scripting and additional automation.

The new version has the following features:

  • Wider platform support (Windows, Mac, Linux, x86_64 and arm64)
  • View your library, downloads, blocklist, episodes
  • View details of a specific series, or episode including description, history, downloaded file info, or the credits
  • View your host and security configs from the CLI to programmatically fetch the API token, among other settings
  • Search your library
  • Add series to your library
  • Delete series, downloads, indexers, root folders, and episode files
  • Trigger automatic searches for series, seasons, or episodes
  • Trigger refresh and disk scan for series and downloads
  • Manually search for series, seasons, or episodes
  • Edit your series and indexers
  • Manage your tags
  • Manage your root folders
  • Manage your blocklist
  • View and browse logs, tasks, events queues, and updates
  • Manually trigger scheduled tasks
  • Manually trigger scheduled tasks
  • And more!

Here's some screenshots of the Sonarr tab:

Thanks to everyone's feedback when I first posted the alpha release here, this version sports a handful of additional performance improvements and platform support.

This is now technically in beta, so if anyone encounters any issues, please let me know!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Laser@feddit.org 1 points 5 days ago

It's rather simple in good cases, here's my version:

{
  lib,
  fetchFromGitHub,
  rustPlatform,
  perl,
}:

let
  pname = "managarr";
  version = "0.4.1";
in

rustPlatform.buildRustPackage {
  inherit pname version;
  src = fetchFromGitHub {
    owner = "Dark-Alex-17";
    repo = pname;
    rev = "df9bba32cb1628fe0bdf33c71089d7ae085066d4";
    hash = "sha256-2KWuqv0nxMc+H+lmuNQ0lbEm5yE2akuZTa7PT5JcvBs=";
  };

  cargoHash = "sha256-hB4uRgVUp6YngMoXqd03U/n+HdlcYdL5bwvTxI4xCLE=";

  nativeBuildInputs = [ perl ];

  meta = {
    description = "A TUI and CLI to manage your Servarrs";
    homepage = "https://github.com/Dark-Alex-17/managarr";
    license = lib.licenses.mit;
    maintainers = [ ];
  };
}
[-] aclarke@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Did you happen to have a GitHub action to go with this too? Turns out that refactor took a lot less time than I expected.

[-] Laser@feddit.org 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

No, but I will try to incorporate the nixpkgs update script into it now that the metadata is fixed for the release. I'm not a nixpkgs maintainer (yet) though but usually this is close to automatic.

If you want, you can also submit and maintain the package, or I can put us both as maintainers

[-] aclarke@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Given that I can't really see what would change in Managarr that would require additional changes in the Nix package, I see no reason not to have us both as maintainers, especially since I don't currently have Nix installed. (It's high up on my to-do list, don't worry! I know I'll like it!)

Are there any files that would need to be checked into the repo so we can maintain an official package for it?

[-] Laser@feddit.org 1 points 3 days ago

No, Cargo.lock is the only relevant optional one for Rust packages and that is already there, so we should be good. I'll request it tomorrow if someone else doesn't beat me to it ;)

[-] aclarke@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Sounds good, let me know! Also give me some links to track it too so I can also add it to the repo!

[-] Laser@feddit.org 1 points 1 day ago

I have opened a pull request at https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/367042, there might be more changes needed as I had an error in the meta section of the package which I rectified according to the reviewers proposed changes. Not sure this is the end of it, but the request is open

[-] aclarke@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Thanks for doing the legwork on this! I would definitely be a bit out of my depth on that PR without actually having Nix installed ๐Ÿ˜‚.

Once it's merged I'll update the README to mention the Nix installation method.

this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2024
116 points (99.2% liked)

Open Source

31696 readers
385 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS