401
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

well until you need capacity why not use an SSD. It's basically mandatory for the operating system drive too

[-] prosp3kt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 14 hours ago

Capacity for what?. There are 4tb SSD m.2 costing $200 bucks cmon...

[-] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 1 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

I would rather not buy so large SSDs. for most stuff the performance advantage is useless while the price is much larger, and my impression is still that such large SSDs have a shorter lifespan (regarding how many writes will it take to break down). recovering data fron a failing HDD is also easier: SSDs just turn read-only or completely fail at one point, in the latter case often even data recovery companies being unable to recover anything, while HDDs will often give signs that a good monitoring software can detect weeks or months before, so that you know to be more cautious with it

this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2024
401 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

59983 readers
2282 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS