445
submitted 15 hours ago by spujb@lemmy.cafe to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone

oldie meme but needed to bring this back due to recent incidents 😭

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] spujb@lemmy.cafe 3 points 3 hours ago

hmm i honestly just don’t understand what the post is trying to say. it’s a bit unclear to me but im sorry there was confusion and hard feelings going on

[-] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 1 points 2 hours ago

Anyone who thinks pretending to be trans is an effective troll hates trans people.

[-] spujb@lemmy.cafe 1 points 2 hours ago

see i agree with that statement when written out like that. the post doesn’t really do anything to get me to that notion on its own though.

[-] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 1 points 1 hour ago

Hm. Maybe it was too subtle? Cunk is explaining why "trolls pretending to be trans" is supposed to be a problem on Lemmy, using her usual brand of accidentally telling it like it is. Lemmy only has a "troll problem" because Lemmy users hate trans people. No trans hate, no troll problem. If everyone respected trans people, nobody would be getting called a troll. If anyone actually tried to troll that way, they'd be met with acceptance and have no power.

[-] spujb@lemmy.cafe 1 points 1 hour ago

hmmm try workshopping different ways to express this thought, i’m quite lost sorry :(

[-] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

All drag's friends on Discord understood the joke on their first read. Drag isn't sure where the misunderstanding is. We're currently in a voice call trying to figure out why anyone doesn't understand this one. Drag's friend suggested maybe you don't think Lemmy is full of transphobes, but drag thinks you do, since you've said Lemmy is very misogynistic, and those two things go together. Maybe you didn't understand that Cunk is supposed to be wrong about the trolls actually existing but right about what the problem the users have is?

[-] spujb@lemmy.cafe 2 points 44 minutes ago

oh okay i get it now. it’s… dense. i usually understand the more complex memes but this one is impenetrable to me. i’m not surprised others had a bad time.

[-] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 1 points 41 minutes ago

Out of curiosity, have you ever watched a Philomena Cunk show? Drag is wondering if that's part of what makes the difference

[-] spujb@lemmy.cafe 1 points 35 minutes ago

i have seen and love her show

[-] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 1 points 24 minutes ago

Bizarre. Are you used to seeing versions of the format where Philomena is 100% right? Drag has seen plenty of memes that do that, and drag thinks they misunderstand the format.

[-] spujb@lemmy.cafe 1 points 16 minutes ago

no i know the format well

i think the issue is the second panel is asking the audience to infer what the opposite or opposing conclusion the author intends us to come to. and with the text given… it’s not obvious.

generally, it’s not rhetorically effective to place the thesis of a work behind a distortion. a lot of the confusion i see in those comments is just struggling to figure out what the authorial intent is because it’s A) not “common knowledge” and B) deeply obfuscated by the Cunk format.

this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2024
445 points (95.5% liked)

196

16708 readers
2385 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS