674
Generated "art" does not rule.
(lemmy.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2024
674 points (92.8% liked)
196
16746 readers
1785 users here now
Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.
Rule: You must post before you leave.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
The way some people defend AI generated images reminds me of the way some people defend the act of tracing other people's art without the artist's permission and uploading it while claiming they made it.
Some of that ai art is pretty awsome actually.
It's not 'art' ffs. It's an image. Sure, it may look nice, but it has 0 meaning, thought, or emotion behind it. This is just another scheme by the rich to milk us some more, as it promotes the idea that art is just a pretty image people pay to look at (consoooom). That's NOT what art is. Art is made by a living being, go pick up a pencil.
Art theft is the antithesis of awesome.
What if an artist makes awsome art from pieces of other people's art? Is that awesome or not?
It is, it's playful and meaningful and awsome. It's my favourite kind of art. It's what the biggest artists do. Art works like memes. When you don't let people derive from each other, you suffocate art.
10 hours of jingling keys to be amazed by on YouTube dot com
I don't understand what you're saying.
If you think that images created by a generative model are amazing, you might also be interested in 10 hours of keys jingling.
Where do I get the jingling keys?
YouTube dot com
That might be interesting actually. I wonder what you would feel like after listening to 10 hours of keys jingling.
Ah, an insult. How novel.