743

Generated "art" does not rule. (lemmy.world)

submitted 4 days ago by Jomega@lemmy.world to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone

127 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] Corno@lemm.ee 11 points 3 days ago

The way some people defend AI generated images reminds me of the way some people defend the act of tracing other people's art without the artist's permission and uploading it while claiming they made it.

[-] big_fat_fluffy@leminal.space -2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Some of that ai art is pretty awsome actually.

[-] Corno@lemm.ee 12 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Art theft is the antithesis of awesome.

[-] big_fat_fluffy@leminal.space -3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

What if an artist makes awsome art from pieces of other people's art? Is that awesome or not?

[-] angrystego@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago

It is, it's playful and meaningful and awsome. It's my favourite kind of art. It's what the biggest artists do. Art works like memes. When you don't let people derive from each other, you suffocate art.