85

His answer is the octopus. What say you?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] seven_phone@lemmy.world 15 points 5 days ago

They are marine which makes fire impossible which severely limits industrial advancement. Similarly they are not social animals which negates a lot of the division of labour advantages of a society. While a species of octopus might advance intellectually to ponder its own existence I doubt it could achieve the infrastructure necessary to significantly control its environment.

[-] MutilationWave@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago

Don't forget that they only live 1-2 years. 3 tops. I think this is even more limiting than fire. And if evolutionary pressure leads to longer lifespans somehow, they must overcome the whole dying after mating thing.

[-] seven_phone@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

True, also they do not raise offspring which means zero communication of non-instinctive knowledge between generations.

[-] Lightcrater@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago

They could use the underwater volcanoes to smeltle the meltle though, thought of that? Checkmate.

[-] seven_phone@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

We have terrestrial volcanoes, how far would human civilisation advanced if they were our only source of fire.

this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2025
85 points (80.1% liked)

science

15110 readers
67 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

<--- rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.

2024-11-11

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS