19
submitted 1 year ago by alex@jlai.lu to c/anarchism@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] poVoq@slrpnk.net 17 points 1 year ago

The article does give an answer though. An "anarchist community" would not suddenly appear out of a vacuum and have to re-create everything from scratch. Arguing like that is indeed a tired trope and lazy strawman.

So any real "anarchist community" would have existing tools to make insulin (like the article says) and thus sufficient time to adapt them or come up with other means to produce insulin that are better suited for a non-hierarchical society.

It is a bit moot to speculate what these adaptations or alternatives might be, as we don't know what this specific "anarchist community" will look like. But if you have experience with process engineering you might realize that existing production methods are rarely the best or most efficient, but rather a result of the pre-existing equipment and capabilities at the time of developing the process. Furthermore existing production processes are rarely further optimized unless there is a strong outside pressure to do so, and in today's society it is usually easier for companies to rely on patents and monopolies to extract the maximum profit.

[-] wahming@monyet.cc 2 points 1 year ago

You're discussing the technical side, while the parent comment is pointing out the main issue lies largely on the social / organizational side, which the article just conveniently handwaves away.

[-] poVoq@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 year ago

Sorry, but you seem to fail to understand the argument, both me and the article make regarding the "social / organizational side": There is no technical reason why an "anarchist community" couldn't produce insulin in sufficient quantities and everything else can't be known at this point in time and is moot to speculate about.

[-] iriyan@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

First of all, the core problem is the prevalence of diabetes and the need for remedy, and if so in a community we should speak in numbers if we were to entertain Marxian curiosity of ideological line and political program. If in my community there are 3 of us I can't hardly think it is a communal problem to mass produce a remedy for the three of us. Maybe we should move somewhere where a remedy exists, before we run out of insulin that is.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2023
19 points (100.0% liked)

Anarchism

3456 readers
1 users here now

Are you an Anarchist? The answer might surprise you!

Rules:

  1. Be respectful
  2. Don't be a nazi
  3. Argue about the point and not the person
  4. This is not the place to debate the merits of anarchism itself. While discussion is encouraged, getting in your “epic dunks on the anarkiddies” is not. As a result of the instance’s poor moderation policies and hostility toward anarchists by default, lemmygrad users are encouraged not to post here, though not explicitly disallowed if they aren’t just looking to start a fight.

See also:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS