524
submitted 1 year ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

The world’s top chess federation has ruled that transgender women cannot compete in its official events for females until an assessment of gender change is made by its officials.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] shapis@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago

Being a minority in any social setting brings difficulties that others just don't otherwise face.

Having a women's category for chess is a way of creating a safe environment for everyone to thrive.

[-] kttnpunk@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Nah, wait, why the hell is there a separate women's category in fucking chess in the first place? Those in charge of this decision are 100% misogynists AND transphobes. There isn't a single good reason for this.

[-] hh93@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago

For the same reason why we need quotas for businesses

Having a role model is hugely important for people picking up something.

If some girl plays chess and looks at the professional players and big tournaments there are no women there. So she likely will not pursue that path professionally. If there is a women's league then there the guarantee that there will be visibility for the winners which then creates more idols for young people and over the years increases the level of play until they are equal enough.

Not to mention the chess-clubs favouring boys on their training since they have a bigger chance to make it big and shine a spotlight on that club that produced this talent. With female only tournaments it's easier to create a name for yourself if you treat both genders equal and create the same talent for both sides there are so many fewer players.

Sure sounds dumb on paper but it's actually really necessary in order to create a pathway to more professional female players

[-] kttnpunk@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

I have a really, really hard time believing treating both genders equal and empowering accessibility + diversity is best achieved by segration.

[-] gens@programming.dev 6 points 1 year ago
[-] arin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Sad that people can't see the good of having a safe space for women to compete in chess... WTF.

[-] HerbalGamer@lemm.ee -4 points 1 year ago

I'm afraid to ask you about your other views.

[-] jimbolauski@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Look at how well Japonese Americans did after we segregated them in internment camps.

[-] zimy@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Having a role model is hugely important for people picking up something.

Maybe society should start teaching kids to just do what they want instead of waiting for some random person that shares arbitrary X-trait to "inspire and empower" them. Be your own person.

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There's what society says and what society does. Society in many countries already says what you propose, again and again. But it doesn't actually react favourably when people do it, especially women.

[-] CaptainBuckleroy@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm going to assume you aren't trolling.

Women traditionally have been discouraged from competitions, including chess. We are at the stage where we should be creating extra opportunities for women to be involved in these competitions. If we didn't, tradition and systemic practices would continue to discourage women.

Chess has no male category. There's co-ed, and female. This allows an extra space for women to compete against each other, feel safe, and make connections and friendships with other women in the minority. While still allowing them to compete in the coed category on a level playing field.

We will most likely continue to be at this stage for generations.

[-] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 2 points 1 year ago

Having a women's category for chess is a way of creating a safe environment for everyone to thrive.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Minorities like trans people? A place where everyone can thrive?

It's fucking chess. I understand men may have more typical interest, but there shouldn't be divisions based on sex or gender. Maybe divisions for some neurodivergent people, but I'd bet on many of the great chess players being neurodivergent in some way.

[-] shapis@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Only counter argument I can give you is have a bit of empathy.

Imagine that you were a young girl and saw this game. Chess. And you wanted to learn how to play.

The first person you asked was your mother and she told you oh that's a boys game. But you still wanted to learn.

So you decide to just read up on the rules. You don't really know anyone that plays. So you just kinda play vs yourself and redo. Old GM matches you found in old magazines. None of them are like you btw. They all seem like old men that live on the opposite side of the world.

You really like the game tho. And eventually you realize oh. There are actual clubs/tourneys near here I can go and play with actual people!

You go. And there's not a single girl there. Because of all the hurdles you had to jump. Most others that would have been interested just quit.

So you get there. You are obviously underprepared because you didn't have the support system that made learning it easy. Because of that you just get wrecked.

In addition to that you probably will have to hear some dumb jokes. That if you didn't have such a rough patch to get there in the first place they might have been funny to you. But they aren't. They just felt like you were being punched down.

Having exclusive tournaments and leagues is a very minor way of rectifying awful historical disparities. It's not perfect and it's not a solution by itself. But it's absolutely needed.

[-] EsheLynn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago

If you are going to chess tournaments, you are past the point of getting your ass kicked in chess club. I said it on another thread, but if people are being demeaning and unsportsmanlike, they can get kicked out just as you would any other game. They do it for MTG, YGO and Pokemon TCG tournaments. Bullshittery about trans people aside, this is more of a systemic issue than anything else.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Only counter argument I can give you is have a bit of empathy.

Trans people are people too. If women need protection, trans people need it even more. They're an even smaller minority that are mistreated even more often. I could write the same made up sad story as you but about a trans person.

If exclusive tournaments are a way to fix historic disparities, women should be kicked out of the league before trans people. I don't totally disagree with the sentiment, but we can't have a league for literally every small group we think of. Maybe there should be the main league and the "historically disparaged" league or something, but trans people should not be being removed from this league.

[-] shapis@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Entirely agree with everything you said. I never implied otherwise.

My entire comment was replying to this:

but there shouldn’t be divisions based on sex or gender.

There absolutely should. Reasoning: in my previous comment above.

[-] barsoap@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

If the gender ratio was something like 1:4 or less, you'd have an argument that everyone should just get along. But there's like 16 times more men in chess than women and separate tournaments means the gals won't have to learn chest thumping to deal with the asshole faction they can simply be catty which they already know how to do.

[-] EsheLynn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 year ago

My apologies. I still don't understand. Are you suggesting that women are too fragile to deal with men's posturing, or what? It's fucking chess. Unless someone is arguing there are blatant skill discrepancies between men an women, it still doesn't makes sense why there are divided tournaments. Is the argument women are less strategically minded, or what?

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What the fuck is this sexist shit? Women are inharently catty and men are inharently aggressive?

If there's an issue with men being aggressive, there needs to be rules to prevent it. If the ratio is a problem, there needs to be tools created to address that. The solution isn't "women are catty and sensitive, so they need to be seperate."

[-] barsoap@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Erm, no. Both are aggressive. Cattiness is aggression.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago

Ok, why did you say men do chest thumping and women are catty?

[-] barsoap@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Because the sexes tend to display aggression, status competition etc. in different ways. Are there catty men and chest-thumping women sure but bimodal distribution. Just like e.g. height.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm not going to argue with it being correct because it doesn't matter. If the issue is aggression then it's aggression, so just say aggression. Catty is also an insulting term. The league should have sportsmanship requirements and it shouldn't matter how your aggression is presented or what gender you are when you are aggressive.

[-] barsoap@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Catty is just as insulting as chest thumping. I'm very much equal opportunity when it comes to dunking on the sexes.

...and sportsmanship is a nice sentiment but people actually have to agree on sticking to it. Basically only Judo comes to mind when it comes to sports which will disqualify you for taunts and stuff and refusing to shake hands and, well, chess isn't dominated by Japanese.

this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
524 points (95.0% liked)

World News

38563 readers
4435 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS