833
submitted 1 year ago by NightOwl@lemm.ee to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml

It uncovered eight WHO panelists involved with assessing safe levels of aspartame consumption who are beverage industry consultants who currently or previously worked with the alleged Coke front group, International Life Sciences Institute (Ilsi).

Their involvement in developing intake guidelines represents “an obvious conflict of interest”, said Gary Ruskin, US Right-To-Know’s executive director. “Because of this conflict of interest, [the daily intake] conclusions about aspartame are not credible, and the public should not rely on them,” he added.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Saneless@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago

That's not better. Splenda just tastes odd. And I haven't seen that in stores in years, and I don't remember liking it the first time around

[-] scottywh@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Splenda legit causes digestive problems... Aspartame is fine... Especially in comparison

this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
833 points (96.2% liked)

World News

32286 readers
562 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS