1436
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] kamen@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

People can babble about water proofing, etc. There is no legitimate engineering problem.

Even if it was a legitimate problem, it's sad that only about half of the phones are certified waterproof even if almost all are sealed.

[-] SnipingNinja@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago

Not that the phones are warrantied against water damage even if they are rated as water resistant.

[-] Ado@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Why is that sad? I can understand why companies don’t want to pay just to get a certification when the phone itself is up to standards regardless

[-] kamen@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

"It's easier to make the phone waterproof if the battery is not user-serviceable" is a common argument; if it's really true, way more phones should be waterproof even if not IP-certified (which understandably costs money and raises the end price).

[-] ZiemekZ@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Samsung Galaxy S5 would like to have a word. IP67 while having user-detachable battery cover.

[-] kamen@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

One of the very few phones like this.

this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2023
1436 points (97.1% liked)

> Greentext

7451 readers
281 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS