1669

Web3 is here and it's glorious (lemmy.world)

submitted 1 year ago by qaz@lemmy.world to c/memes@lemmy.ml

247 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] StarManta@lemmy.world 102 points 1 year ago

Trying to claim the term “Web3” is a futile battle. It is already widely understood to mean crypto and blockchain. If I see a job posting that says the company is built on Web3, I know immediately that the job is built on scams and grifts without having to ask further questions. Web3 as a term is ruined already.

For this to work it must be a different term than Web3. Maybe “Web 3.0” is different enough?

[-] kimpilled@infosec.pub 31 points 1 year ago

Time for Web4

[-] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 15 points 1 year ago

I suggest forking Web3 into at least three competing things

[-] Ubermeisters@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 year ago

as long as they all compete to be the standard, and aren't going to communicate with each other well, I'm in!

[-] andrew@lemmy.stuart.fun 6 points 1 year ago

Can Web3-D be unnecessary VR integration?

[-] mustardman@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 1 year ago

Just do what USB does and call it "Web 3 v2"

[-] vidumec@lemmy.sdf.org 17 points 1 year ago

Web 3 v2 final (1)

[-] kimpilled@infosec.pub 8 points 1 year ago

Note that not all Web 3 v2 final (1) features are required to be labeled Web 3 v2 final (1). Please consult vendor documentation to determine which features are supported on their device.