this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2025
26 points (88.2% liked)
GenZedong
4454 readers
109 users here now
This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.
This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.
We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.
Rules:
- No bigotry, anti-communism, pro-imperialism or ultra-leftism (anti-AES)
- We support indigenous liberation as the primary contradiction in settler colonies like the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Israel
- If you post an archived link (excluding archive.org), include the URL of the original article as well
- Unless it's an obvious shitpost, include relevant sources
- For articles behind paywalls, try to include the text in the post
- Mark all posts containing NSFW images as NSFW (including things like Nazi imagery)
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
As you can see from people commenting in this thread and discussions elsewhere, someone with positive or negative opinions of AI will lump or leave out different technologies to determine whether AI is good or bad. So being pro and anti AI doesn’t refer to the same thing for everyone.
That said, the current ‘pro-AI’ push in global markets is a naked attempt to develop technologies with the intention of maximizing the required amount of expensive computing power needed to accomplish a goal. After crypto mining fell through a bit and stopped filling the role of computation blackhole, something new was needed.
This is a fair point.