this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2025
1015 points (98.8% liked)

World News

44301 readers
4463 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

The White House has directed the State and Treasury Departments to draft a proposal for lifting some U.S. sanctions on Russia as part of Trump’s effort to restore ties and end the Ukraine war.

The proposal could ease restrictions on select Russian entities and oligarchs, though it’s unclear what the U.S. would receive in return.

Trump has signaled openness to sanctions relief despite previously threatening harsher measures.

Talks between U.S. and Russian officials have intensified, with economic cooperation, including rare earth minerals, emerging as a key topic.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MisanthropiCynic@lemm.ee 4 points 2 weeks ago (11 children)

You probably also were taught to use at least a 30 calibre bullet like the M21 (which is what the Secret Service used to return fire)

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (10 children)

I wasn't being trained as an assassin.

Choosing the calibre wouldn't be my prerogative.

What we were shooting with was just 7.62. Which now that I check equates to a .30cal actually. Never knew that, huh.

I did handle some .50cals, but not a sniper rifle, and I don't know how sneaky I could be with a tripod mounted .50cal AA machine gun.

Tldr basic conscription but I did go the longer way voluntarily and am an NCO. I just recalled some basic ballistics lectures from your comment.

[–] Fluke@lemm.ee 2 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

You don't have to be sneaky, just not fucking miss like the gormless cretin that last tried.

[–] MisanthropiCynic@lemm.ee 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

But he missed because the bullet he used was too small and too light and didn’t have a proper ballistic trajectory

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

5.56 effective range out of a 16" barrel is 500 yards. Trump was a mere 400 feet from Crooks.

"Brandon Webb, a former Navy SEAL and the former head instructor of the SEAL Sniper course, said a well-trained shooter could shoot very accurately with an AR-15 at the distance at which Crooks shot Trump, especially with a magnified optic such as an ACOG sight."

Dude missed. The weapon and projectile are more than capable of delivering an accurate and lethal hit at that distance.

TL: DR, Skill issue.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)