this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2025
404 points (83.0% liked)

Progressive Politics

2188 readers
482 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Right now they don't have more than two parties not because they don't want to but basically because they can't.

Once that would be possible watch everyone vote for who they actually want to vote for. Within no time you'd be seeing dozens of parties pop up

[–] Lyrl@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Australia has had ranked choice voting for decades. Wikipedia describes their system as a "mild" two-party system. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_political_parties_in_Australia

I don't see any reason the US would have a different outcome. But I believe transitioning from our current "hard" two-party system to a "mild" one would be a huge positive.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The Netherlands always had 10-20 parties.

Maybe Australia should simply push for more parties..more choice is always better

[–] Lyrl@lemm.ee 1 points 4 days ago

The Netherlands has party-list proportional representation. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Party-list_proportional_representation

Instant run-off / ranked choice voting is a different system, and where implemented I'm not aware of it leading to many parties. I believe it will make the two parties better, which is still a good and beneficial outcome.