this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2025
1020 points (98.9% liked)

politics

22011 readers
3912 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Tailzse836@lemm.ee 88 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Why are they complaining about eggs, can’t they just eat cake?

/s

[–] Azzu@lemm.ee 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I really hope most people got this reference :)

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Our education system is bad, but it's not "don't teach about the French revolution" bad. Hell my high school even made a point to point out that Antoinette was a teenager who likely didn't actually say that

[–] dion_starfire@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If it was truly her that said it, she would have been even younger than that. The book in which it's written (which is known to not be fully factual and in which the quote is attributed to "a great princess") was written when Antoinette was 9 years old. But it wasn't published until she was 26, eight years after she became queen.

"If they have no bread, let them eat cake." sounds like something I would expect a 6-7yo who had never gone without luxury food to say.

[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago

sounds like something I would expect a 6-7yo who had never gone without luxury food to say

You mean like Elon's toddler son?

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Ah, but online high schools/credit recovery. The French Revolution is often covered in a fifteen minute video with four multiple choice questions and a short response (which is almost always turned in with an obviously AI generated answer, and marked with 100% because there’s no longer an expectation that a teacher be qualified to teach their subject - a high school diploma is enough in Oklahoma)

I’d met with a high schooler over zoom (thirty minutes once a week was the requirement) - “hey, tell me what you thought about that American Civil War unit you just completed?” - and they wouldn’t be able to name the century the war happened, had no idea who Abraham Lincoln was, couldn’t name the Confederacy - hell, didn’t recognize that the American Civil War happened in the United States.

My current role as a tutor (because most high schools would rather have an unqualified high school grad that a transsexual union member with a masters degree - and tbh, getting a school bomb threats on the off chance that LibsOfTikTok targets me is not a risk I feel I can expose others too) shocks me. You have long term subs that don’t understand the pre algebra concepts teaching Algebra 2 and Pre Calc. (Every time I hear the term “cross multiply” I cringe in preparation for the horror I’m about to see)

But yes - education is 100% that bad in southern states.

[–] JuxtaposedJaguar@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

She had a fake rural village built so she could cosplay as a peasant, though, so it's not far off.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

I can't imagine anything she could've reasonably done in the environment she lived in that wouldn't've been deeply offensive to the peasantry. Versailles was at its core a tool to insulate the nobility and separate them from reality. Her life and death were tragic, not because of some condemnation of the poor who killed her, but because they weren't even wrong to do so and yet this teenager who was probably one of the least evil people at Versailles had to be the one to pay the price for the systems crafted by people like Louis XIV and Maria Theresa Hapsburg.

The republic was necessary. The fall of bourbon was necessary. The people were right to be mad. But there is a tragedy in how some people are corrupted and broken by power they wouldn't have asked for and have to pay the price for it

[–] holycrap@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Eggs are an ingredient for most types of cake

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Very nice! I got that one!