I'd like to start a discussion about a potential feature for our platform.
As someone who moderates religious-based communities here on Lemmy, I've encountered a recurring issue: frequent brigading by anti-religious users.
This got me thinking about community management options.
Currently, Lemmy allows communities to be public or mod-only.
However, I personally believe that Lemmy could potentially benefit from additional options similar to those available on Reddit:
- Restricted Communities: Where anyone can view, but only approved members can post/comment.
- Private Communities: Where only approved members can view and participate.
Questions for discussion:
- Do you think these additional privacy options would be beneficial for Lemmy?
- How might this impact the overall user experience and community dynamics?
- Could this help address issues like brigading in sensitive topic areas?
- Are there potential downsides or concerns about implementing such features?
- How would this align with Lemmy's philosophy and goals as a platform?
I'm interested in hearing your thoughts, experiences, and perspectives on this matter.
Those don't really make too much sense to me. The first one just ban them if you don't want them participating in the community. You can do a temp ban and hope they chill out, and perm if they're that bad. But unsubscribing them just seems weird.
Some automod like functionality could handle the second one, but the lack of overall karma is what I like most about lemmy vs reddit. Plus once again you could just manually ban them. IDK if lemmy ignores votes from banned users though so they could just continue downvoting everything if they're petty.
Currently banned users cannot vote in the community
My main issue is if you ban somebody from a community, it goes into the mod log, kind of like that person's permanent record. It's harsh to ban somebody for just voting negativity