this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2025
52 points (98.1% liked)

GenZedong

4454 readers
110 users here now

This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.

This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.

We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

We're starting off with a very short one for the first week. This text was published in 1915, two years before the October revolution, and is sadly still highly relevant in the imperial core.

This reading group is meant to educate, and people from any instances federated with Lemmygrad are welcome. Any comments not engaging in good faith will be removed (don't respond to hostile comments, just report them).

You can post questions or share your thoughts at any time. We'll be moving on to a new text next week, but this thread won't be locked.

You can read the text here.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GrainEater@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Would this be the moment for the working class of Russia to organize to topple their oligarchy?

Organization is an ongoing project, but taking power without the support of the army would likely lead to a civil war, and now is not a good time for Russia to be destabilized

[–] Red_Scare@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

would likely lead to a civil war, and now is not a good time for Russia to be destabilized

This is exactly the position Lenin critisises in this text. Lenin is quite clear:

A revolution in wartime means civil war

[–] bennieandthez@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Yes but the global context is different, the imperialist hegemon would benefit from a civil war in Russia, a communist revolution in Russia at this moment could very well be found itself fighting for the globally reactionary class war. In fact, the US would absolutely fund such a group, just like in Syria with the SDF.

[–] Red_Scare@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

the imperialist hegemon would benefit from a civil war in Russia

Again this is exactly the kind of thinking Lenin is railing against in the very text we're discussing.

The phrase-bandying Trotsky has completely lost his bearings on a simple issue. It seems to him that to desire Russia’s defeat means desiring the victory of Germany.

[–] bennieandthez@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 12 hours ago

Again, this is not the same context of the WW1, this is not one imperialist state fighting another imperialist state, this is an imperialist state trying to subjugate another state through their proxies Ukraine and NATO.