this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2025
52 points (98.1% liked)

GenZedong

4454 readers
110 users here now

This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.

This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.

We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

We're starting off with a very short one for the first week. This text was published in 1915, two years before the October revolution, and is sadly still highly relevant in the imperial core.

This reading group is meant to educate, and people from any instances federated with Lemmygrad are welcome. Any comments not engaging in good faith will be removed (don't respond to hostile comments, just report them).

You can post questions or share your thoughts at any time. We'll be moving on to a new text next week, but this thread won't be locked.

You can read the text here.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Red_Scare@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

it gets incredibly complex when it’s about ascendant capitalist countries like Russia.

It really doesn't though. Russia was a backwards agrarian state barely on its way out of feudalism when Lenin wrote this, he even explicitly acknowledges it right in this text:

Russia, a most backward country, where an immediate socialist revolution is impossible.

If Lenin's thesis applied to WW1 Russia, it surely applies to SMO Russia.

[–] bennieandthez@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

Both war contexts are very different. WW1 was inherently imperialist, imperialist countries fighting for a better share of the world while the current war is about stopping NATO expansion in Ukraine, NATO being the alliance of imperialist countries, Russia is found in a progressive side in this time.

Russia is simply not a part of the imperial core, like nor is Iran, another locally reactionary state. I cannot find myself supporting a movement, regardless of their politics, that weakens these states that one way or another are found themselves fighting against US hegemony, because that would make me end up in the pro-US side.

I think Domenico Losurdo "Class Struggle" does a really good job explaining the nuances of class struggle and the different forms it can take from small to global perspectives. Locally progressive struggles can find themselves helping a globally reactionary struggle while locally reactionary struggles can find themselves helping a globally progressive struggle.

[–] Red_Scare@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 13 hours ago

This is lesser evilism. Sure, Russia has legitimate security concerns about NATO expansion, this doesn't make this war a "progressive struggle" though. Ultimately it is just as much about control over Ukrainian resources and Russia simply acts like any capitalist power would. Russia does support some progressive struggles around the world but Ukraine isn't it.