this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2025
34 points (87.0% liked)
World News
34870 readers
332 users here now
News from around the world!
Rules:
-
Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
-
No NSFW content
-
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I mean, they were loading tanks on transporters, that seem pretty invadey.
Something heavy, slow, tread based, with easily controlled variable weight, that's cheap enough to replace if anything goes wrong and something that's been rendered useless on modern battlefields so has no further original use?
I wonder why they would use that to test barges that are far more valuable as overwater construction and resupply; rather than the absolutely silly idea of static targets for artillery, which is their only actual military function.
I mean I feel like I'm taking crazy pills. How do you people think this would function as a 'war bridge'? You'd need hundreds. If one can touch shore then just use a normal barge, not this Wylie e coyote nonsense. If one can't touch the shore, a hundred of them in an in movable chain that takes hours to align won't be able to.
It was a converted car transport. They already knew it floated with a load of cars.
And a load of cars is far less heavy and less dynamically loaded than say, a crane. Or a group of construction equipment.
Again, if this worked, any single barge in existence would work better. A Wylie e coyote bridge made of hundreds of barges is too ridiculous even for the most westoid brain version of China. This is 'dem Chinese eat Muslim babies to take our jobs' level of silly.