this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2025
237 points (98.0% liked)

politics

22104 readers
5608 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

The Trump administration has frozen $175 million in federal funding to the University of Pennsylvania over its policies allowing trans women to compete in women's sports.

A senior official said this is "just a taste" of further action, with UPenn at risk of losing all federal funding due to a Title IX investigation.

Trump signed an executive order on February 5 banning trans women from women's sports, citing fairness and safety concerns.

Advocacy groups are challenging the move, arguing it discriminates against trans athletes.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Xanza@lemm.ee -3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I'm a constitution loving leftist. I've never voted red. My brother is trans, and trans rights is particularly important to me.

But again, whatever you need to tell yourself to sleep at night because it's simply unconscionable to you that someone can advocate for someone's rights that doesn't show up on your "acceptable groups of people" list. It always blows my mind away that people who pretend to be so enlightened think nothing of denying the rights of others when the marginalized groups they pretend to represent know all too well what that feels like.

Other people don't stop having rights simply because you do, and vice versa. All rights must be protected, even the ones you find repugnant, or we all lose rights. It's the foundational cornerstone of our democracy, the constitution, and history.

But I guess we'll just gloss over that because I said "other people also have rights" and you interpret that to be transphobic...somehow.

[–] tree_frog@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

So you see your trans brother as 'genetically' a woman? I am sure he loves that.

You know, your brother could have been born with XY chromosomes and a genetic mutation. Your family wouldn't have discovered the Y chromosome until she went through puberty. And I use she here because that's how she would have been socialized, and that would have been her sex assigned at birth too. If this was your sibling, would she be genetically male or genetically female?

And nothing in any of your arguments has demonstrated to me that you aren't for segregation. Not just for myself but also for black people really. You've argued that bigots have a right to public spaces where they don't have to be around folks that they don't find repugnant. Simply through mob rule. Which is allowing the feelings of one group to infringe upon the rights of another. Because hurting your feelings isn't considered harmful in our culture. While exclusion from public spaces and activities is.

Which shows to me that you don't understand what a human right is or where they came from when our constitution was written. The founders believed in natural rights, they wrote the bill of rights to ensure that certain rights were never infringed upon. They are enumerated but not exhaustive.

For the state or mob to infringe upon the rights of the individual, there needs to be demonstrated a government interest in keeping the community safe. Little girls aren't getting ran over by genetic males on the soccer field. So there is no public interest here, only political ambitions and the feels of bigots.

And just so we're clear, your language is a repetition of those neoliberal and right-wing talking points above.

Trans healthcare and hormones are very nuanced, a child could be put on puberty blockers and in the Presidents opinion be genetically male. Even though it is very easy to demonstrate that that child is not a danger to the well-being of any of the other children on the field.

Yes, bigots have a right to their opinion, we don't police thoughts obviously or speech, or at least we try not to. But that does not give them the right to tell children that they can't play sports without demonstrating how doing so is depriving other children of their right to play sports in a safe environment.

So, now that I am calmer, I hope I have explained to you well enough why essentially everyone is disagreeing with you and downvoting you in this comment thread. Please look in the mirror and do some self-crit if you are indeed a leftist.

[–] Xanza@lemm.ee -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

My brother, born a woman, transitioned. The only one that has called him a woman has been you and if you were standing in front of me I would have already made your face completely flat for it. You have this so incredibly backwards it's actually fucked up to watch. You don't know me. You only know what you've convinced yourself that you know about me which is absolutely nothing.

The one who shows they don't know what human rights are, is you. Human rights are not universal. They change from country to country. Countries literally sit down and vote on what they believe is and is not a human right.

Almost everything that you've said in any of your replies start to finish has been fucked up, a misunderstanding on your behalf, or a complete and total fabrication.

People have a constitutional right to the freedom of expression. If a bigot wants to protest black people in a public place they have every right to do that. That's not me defending their actions that's me literally pointing out that they have the right to do that and you do not have the right to take that right away from them simply because you have disagree with it. I'm so sick and tired of watching little children like yourself run around and act like they're such forward-thinkers and they're so pro-rights while simultaneously not acknowledging that even people you disagree with have rights.

You're not half as good a person as you think you are, you're absolutely not as open-minded as you believe yourself to be and you're probably less than a third as smart as you think you are.

[–] tree_frog@lemm.ee 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

All I did was flip around your wording and apply it to your brother. I guess trans men are real men, and trans women like myself are still 'genetically men'. More right-wing brain worms.

Anyway, I'm done engaging. Take care.