7
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] xxjackthewolfxx@ttrpg.network 1 points 1 year ago

then ur an oath of redemption get fucked dumbass, read the lore

[-] TheGreatDarkness@ttrpg.network 1 points 1 year ago

All serious tho, one of ideas I know I will never be able to do is to play the same Paladin in 3 succesful campaigns in one setting, first as Oath of Conquest, then Oathbreaker, then Oath of Redemption. I first it's a better growth if there is a transition phase before adopting the Redeption.

[-] gerusz@ttrpg.network 1 points 1 year ago

The problem with Redemption is that it's an externally-focused oath, trying to redeem others. A conquest paladin having an "am I the baddy" moment and turning into a redemption paladin is like a douchy bully who suddenly finds Jesus then tries to convert people without apologizing for the years of bullying.

D&D needs an Oath of Atonement which would be specifically focused on making up for the shit you did as a previous less-than-moral paladin subclass (mostly conquest, sometimes revenge, occasionally crown or devotion).

this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2023
7 points (81.8% liked)

RPGMemes

10350 readers
369 users here now

Humor, jokes, memes about TTRPGs

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS